Finally the verdict arrives, but pseudo secularists are very sad because it didn’t arrive on the chariot of bloodshed and violence. The evening of September 30 marked the dawn of a new era. Yes there are feelings of discontent, there are feelings of disappointment about the decision of the H’ble High Court, but all the feelings were expressed in such a matured way that entire world should learn from Indian people.
Now a few words from my keyboard … as I cant refrain from writing a few lines…
1. Yes, decision is not 100% based on logic and can not be treated legally sound but the question to be answered here by critics is – Is FAITH 100% logical and legal? If faith is something much above the limitations of logics and legal soundness how could be the decision?
2. Shri Ram’s era is a matter of dispute for most of historians, but nobody can doubt stature of Shri Ram as GOD in Hindu system of belief. But all people have a correct knowledge of the era in which Babar and Meer Baki lived on this earth. But still no documentary evidence of orders for constitution of a mosque was shown to common people by any of the party.
3. Court decided the partition of land on the basis of law of possession, so this is something which is not sentimental but legal.
4. Those, who refuse the report of ASI and historical evidences, should make it very clear that what else they will accept and refuse according to there own law of convenience.
5. Politics should be kept far from the premise of Ayodhya now onwards and BJP, Samajwadi Party, Bahujan Samajwadi Party and Congress all should keep silence over the issue, because Ayodhya and Muslims are no more concern of the political parties. They are part of the nation and they need their own sphere of privacy to realize their true needs and priorities.
People all around the globe are looking towards Indian Democracy and this decision has no risk on future of Indian Democracy, because neither Shahbano case nor the Gujrat riots have loosened the firm bases of Indian Democracy. Our democracy is efficient enough because of the check and balance mechanism which few highly evolved democracies of the world have.
